<![CDATA[Option to log panel activites]]>Ran into a situation where a user was being added to a queue. Not sure why this happened or who did it.

This prompted the idea of having a log of activities of who did what when.

This can be useful for tracking channel spy events, queue add / remove, call transfers, dials, etc.

This log can also be used to show how often the panel is being used and for what purposes.

]]>http://localhost:4567/topic/633/option-to-log-panel-activitesRSS for NodeTue, 27 Oct 2026 03:13:13 GMTWed, 02 Feb 2011 21:31:20 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Option to log panel activites on Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:24:07 GMT]]>I have added the feature to 2.20 beta, It will write to a log file in a format like:

1297811137|3606|GENERAL|SUCCESSFUL LOGIN
1297811238|3606|GENERAL|DIAL|6602@from-internal
1297811259|3606|GENERAL|RECORD|Monitor|SIP/3606-00000aa2
1297811263|3606|GENERAL|RECORD|PauseMonitor|SIP/3606-00000aa2
1297811271|3606|GENERAL|HANGUP|SIP/3606-00000aa2
1297811285|3606|GENERAL|QUEUEADD|1101|Local/3606@from-queue/n
1297811294|3606|GENERAL|QUEUEPAUSE|Local/3606@from-queue/n
1297811298|3606|GENERAL|QUEUEREMOVE|1101|Local/3606@from-queue/n

Do you think this is good enough?

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/2756http://localhost:4567/post/2756Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:24:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Option to log panel activites on Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:02:43 GMT]]>I will probably add an action log, where every user action will be registered. But after releasing 2.20 final, as I do not want to delay the release with big new features as this one.

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/2755http://localhost:4567/post/2755Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:02:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Option to log panel activites on Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:44:03 GMT]]>This is a good idea.

The inability to know who is using the Spy and Record features is what prevents me from deploying it to my users.

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/2754http://localhost:4567/post/2754Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:44:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Option to log panel activites on Mon, 07 Feb 2011 01:27:53 GMT]]>Thanks for the suggestion. I will think about it... Best regards,

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/2753http://localhost:4567/post/2753Mon, 07 Feb 2011 01:27:53 GMT