<![CDATA[Version Control]]>Nicolas,

Not trying to sound rude, but if you are going to do minor updates to FOP2, please update the file name with some sort of sub version number.

i appreciate the initial download I did was very early in the piece, and you were still settling down your processes/website. It was only seeing a post mentioning some changes, that I realised that the download may be different, even though the filenames are the same.

I have now have two fop2-001-i386-glibc2.5-centos5 files where the fop_server is 5,999,769 bytes and dated the 30Jun and the second is 6,015,149 and dated the 31st July.

Otherwise the product is great.

Regards
Bob

]]>http://localhost:4567/topic/72/version-controlRSS for NodeTue, 27 Oct 2026 02:22:39 GMTWed, 12 Aug 2009 20:35:18 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Version Control on Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:59:00 GMT]]>Hi Bob,

You are right, the different versions were for fixing some bugs. I won't be updating the tarballs anymore without changing version numbers (that means until the next release). I will also add the version number to the daemon itself so you can actually know the release you have.

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/364http://localhost:4567/post/364Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:59:00 GMT