Version Control
Nicolas,
Not trying to sound rude, but if you are going to do minor updates to FOP2, please update the file name with some sort of sub version number.
i appreciate the initial download I did was very early in the piece, and you were still settling down your processes/website. It was only seeing a post mentioning some changes, that I realised that the download may be different, even though the filenames are the same.
I have now have two fop2-001-i386-glibc2.5-centos5 files where the fop_server is 5,999,769 bytes and dated the 30Jun and the second is 6,015,149 and dated the 31st July.
Otherwise the product is great.
Regards
Bob
Not trying to sound rude, but if you are going to do minor updates to FOP2, please update the file name with some sort of sub version number.
i appreciate the initial download I did was very early in the piece, and you were still settling down your processes/website. It was only seeing a post mentioning some changes, that I realised that the download may be different, even though the filenames are the same.
I have now have two fop2-001-i386-glibc2.5-centos5 files where the fop_server is 5,999,769 bytes and dated the 30Jun and the second is 6,015,149 and dated the 31st July.
Otherwise the product is great.
Regards
Bob
Comments
You are right, the different versions were for fixing some bugs. I won't be updating the tarballs anymore without changing version numbers (that means until the next release). I will also add the version number to the daemon itself so you can actually know the release you have.